data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78423/78423f3289d8537903bc1a699f2713327d959ffb" alt=""
'It was deemed necessary to rebrand when an extensive audit and review revealed the ‘leaf’ logo to be outdated. after 15 years this was understandable. the creation of one strong masterbrand is an opportunity to build a new identity that resonates with our staff, our community, our customers and for the city of melbourne as an local, national and international destination. looking at other cities such as london or new york you see the strength of their single brand.
The ‘leaf’ was found to be weak when stacked up against other national and international city brands and there was also little understanding of what the ‘leaf’ represented. In addition, the proliferation of additional logos resulted in a lack of shared understanding of the city of Melbourne exposing a fragmentation of our identity.'"
I like it, who cares if it cost $240,000, it was significantly cheaper than other corporate rebrandings.
source: www.designboom.com
No comments:
Post a Comment